Law School Wannabes Don't Think You Should Be Able To Use ChatGPT To Get Through The Application Process, Above the Law, 10/3/23
This article discusses the use of ChatGPT in the law school application process. It highlights concerns from some individuals who believe that applicants should not be allowed to use AI tools like ChatGPT to assist with their application essays, arguing that it could lead to unfair advantages and undermine the authenticity of personal statements. The article suggests that while AI tools can be valuable for research and writing, there is a debate surrounding their use in the context of law school admissions, with some arguing for stricter regulations to maintain the integrity of the application process.
12 Thoughts on Promises and Challenges of AI in Legal after Yesterday's AI Summit at Harvard Law School, LawSites, 9/20/23
Bob Ambrogi discusses the promises and challenges of AI in the legal field following a summit at Harvard Law School. He highlights how AI technologies like ChatGPT have the potential to revolutionize legal research and document drafting, improving efficiency and accuracy. However, he also mentions concerns related to the ethical use of AI in the legal profession, particularly regarding transparency, bias, and privacy issues. Ambrogi provides insights into the ongoing discussions and developments in the application of AI in the legal industry, emphasizing the need for responsible and ethical AI adoption.
Education tech policy groups call on federal officials for AI guidance, State Scoop, 9/20/23
This article discusses the release of guidance on artificial intelligence (AI) in education by the U.S. Department of Education. The guidance emphasizes the importance of responsible AI implementation in schools and the need to address potential biases, equity, privacy, and security concerns. It aims to help educators make informed decisions about AI tools and systems, ensuring they benefit all students and do not perpetuate inequalities.
Imagine If Law Schools Cared As Much About Affordable Tuition As They Do About ChatGPT!, Above the Law, 9/19/23
This article explores the diverse opinions on AI in legal education, addressing the debate over AI, specifically ChatGPT, in legal education. Some educators believe AI can assist law students with research and document preparation, while others worry it may hinder critical thinking skills. Critics fear students may rely too heavily on AI, while proponents see it as a valuable tool when used responsibly. The article explores the diverse opinions on AI in legal education.
If law schools prohibit ChatGPT in writing, can they back it up?, ABA Journal, 8/31/23
This article discusses how law schools grapple with the use of AI technology, particularly ChatGPT, in legal writing. Some schools may seek to ban or restrict AI use in academic work to maintain writing skills' integrity. However, enforcing such bans is challenging because of the difficulty in detecting AI-generated content. While AI can aid legal research and writing, it raises concerns about originality and the role of human judgment in legal education. The article explores these dilemmas and the debate surrounding AI's role in legal writing instruction.
Abandoning Precedent: The Case for Bringing ChatGPT into Law Schools, Verdict Justia, 8/25/23
This article argues for integrating ChatGPT into law schools to challenge the concept of legal precedent. It suggests that using ChatGPT can help students explore legal issues from different perspectives by generating alternative legal arguments. The author contends that ChatGPT can provide students with a valuable tool to broaden their legal reasoning skills, encourage critical thinking, and foster innovation in the legal field.
AI In Law School: A Leap Into The Unknown, Law360, 8/2/23
Law schools are incorporating AI tools like ChatGPT into their programs, aiding students in various legal tasks. However, questions arise regarding the impact on students' critical thinking skills, potential issues related to plagiarism, and the need for a balanced approach to ensure comprehensive legal education. This article explores the benefits and drawbacks of AI in legal education and highlights the need for a balanced approach to ensure students receive a well-rounded legal education.
Learning the Law with AI: Why Law School Students Are Tentative about Using ChatGPT, LawNext, 6/2/23
Law school students have varying levels of enthusiasm for using AI, particularly ChatGPT, as an educational tool. While some believe it can assist in research and writing, others worry it might limit critical thinking skills and raise ethical issues, including plagiarism. Legal educators must carefully consider the benefits and drawbacks of AI integration to enhance legal education effectively.
I'm a Student. You Have No Idea How Much We're Using ChatGPT, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 5/12/23
This article discusses how students are increasingly using AI, specifically ChatGPT, for academic purposes. While some students find it beneficial for generating ideas and providing alternative viewpoints, others express concerns about over-reliance on AI, the potential for plagiarism, and its impact on creativity and critical thinking skills. This highlights the ongoing debate about AI's role in education and the need for clear guidelines and ethical considerations when using these tools.
ChatGPT Goes to Law School, Journal of Legal Education, revised 5/19/23
How well can AI models write law school exams without human assistance? To find out, we used the widely publicized AI model ChatGPT to generate answers on four real exams at the University of Minnesota Law School. We then blindly graded these exams as part of our regular grading processes for each class. Over 95 multiple choice questions and 12 essay questions, ChatGPT performed on average at the level of a C+ student, achieving a low but passing grade in all four courses. After detailing these results, we discuss their implications for legal education and lawyering. We also provide example prompts and advice on how ChatGPT can assist with legal writing.
AI Terms for Legal Professionals: Understanding What Powers Legal Tech, Lexis Insights, 3/20/23
The legal technology landscape is evolving rapidly in front of our eyes, creating a whole new vocabulary of AI-related terms and phrases. For those of us who aren’t product developers or software engineers, it’s helpful to define what these terms mean. This user guide is designed to equip you with a better understanding of key AI concepts.
How ChatGPT and Generative AI Impact Legal Writing and Research Courses, ALWD Virtual Front Porch, 2/17/23
This article explores how ChatGPT and generative AI are influencing legal writing and research courses. It highlights the benefits of using AI for generating drafts, conducting initial research, and expanding students' exposure to legal knowledge. However, it also raises concerns about potential ethical issues, plagiarism, and maintaining the authenticity of student work. The article suggests that while AI can be a valuable teaching tool, instructors should provide clear guidelines and ensure that students understand the proper use of these technologies in legal education.